Aligned feedback starts with success criteria that describe observable qualities of the work. Mark criterion by criterion, point to the evidence in the student's response, name…
Read more
Write report comments faster by working from evidence you already have: your rubric, your marking notes and a vetted comment bank. Batch students by achievement standard,…
Read more
The fastest way is the connect, mark, review flow: connect or upload a whole class of essays at once, let JeddAI draft marks and feedback against…
Read more
Scan or photograph each student's pages in good light, save them as a single PDF per student, and upload that file to their submission. Handwriting recognition…
Read more
A workable rubric lists the criteria you actually judge, gives each one three to five clearly separated performance levels, and describes each level in observable terms…
Read more
Setting up JeddAI for your first assignment means picking one real task, entering the rubric, success criteria and comment bank you already use for it, adding…
Read more You review and edit JeddAI's draft feedback by treating it as a first draft, not a final verdict: read each comment against the student's work and…
Read more
Read the whole response, decide which NESA mark range best describes it, then choose a mark inside that range. Band-style guidelines judge quality, not quantity. Translate…
Read more You stay in control by treating AI as a drafting assistant, not a decision-maker. Anchor it to your own rubric and success criteria, read every drafted…
Read more Student data can be safe with AI grading tools, but FERPA places that responsibility on your school or district, not the tool itself. FERPA lets approved…
Read more Most teachers spend several hours a week grading, with surveys often citing around five or more hours and much of it done at night or on…
Read more Grade a large essay pile in a weekend by working in criterion batches instead of essay by essay, giving each paper a strict time budget, and…
Read more
