Build a comment bank by collecting the feedback you already give most often and organising it by criterion, so you can insert precise, reusable comments while marking. Group comments into strengths and next steps under each success criterion, write them to be actionable, and leave gaps to personalise each one.
What exactly is a comment bank, and why does it speed up marking?
A comment bank is a curated set of your best, reusable feedback comments, organised so you can drop the right one into a piece of work in seconds. It speeds up marking because most feedback repeats: across a single class, the same strengths and the same weaknesses appear again and again. Instead of retyping a similar comment thirty times, you write it once, carefully, and reuse it wherever it fits.
The saving compounds across a marking pile and across the year. A good bank also lifts consistency, because every student who makes the same error receives the same clear, criterion-linked advice rather than a rushed version written late at night. The aim is not to depersonalise feedback but to stop spending effort on the repetitive parts, so you can direct it where each student genuinely needs something individual.
How should you organise a comment bank so it stays usable?
Organise a comment bank by criterion first, then by whether a comment names a strength or a next step. Structuring it around your rubric strands or success criteria — analysis, structure, evidence, expression — means that while you are marking one criterion you only scan the comments that belong to it. A flat, alphabetical list becomes unusable once it grows past a few dozen entries.
Within each criterion, separate strengths from targets so you can quickly assemble a balanced piece of feedback. Give each comment a short code — A1 and A2 for the first criterion, B1 for the next — so you can tag work fast and even mark a margin with the code as you read. The structure below keeps a growing bank navigable rather than turning it into a second haystack.
- Top level: one section per rubric strand or success criterion
- Within each strand: separate strengths from next steps
- A short code per comment (for example A1, A2) for quick tagging
- A small set of common errors for whole-class feedback
- A set of sentence openers to vary how comments read
How do you write comments that stay specific instead of generic?
Keep comments specific by making each one name the criterion, point to the evidence, and state the next step. Feedback works best when it is focused on the task and the success criteria and tells students what to do next, not only what went wrong. A comment such as “Explain how your evidence supports the point, rather than leaving the quote to speak for itself” travels across many scripts without collapsing into “good work” or “needs more detail”.
Write feedforward, not just judgement. The strongest bank comments pair an observation with a concrete action the student can take on the next attempt, so vague praise and vague criticism are both worth avoiding — each is equally forgettable. Aim for wording a student could act on without having to ask you what you meant.
Build in blanks. Writing a comment with a gap — “Your paragraph on ___ makes the point clearly; now add a sentence explaining why it matters” — lets you keep it reusable while dropping in the specific detail as you mark. This is the single best habit for staying precise without slowing down.
How do you build a comment bank without starting from scratch?
The fastest way to build a comment bank is to mine the feedback you already write. For the next assignment you mark, keep a document open beside you and paste in any comment you catch yourself writing more than once. Within one or two marking cycles you will have the backbone of a bank, drawn entirely from your own voice and standards rather than someone else’s phrasing.
Then refine and organise. Group the harvested comments under their criteria, rewrite the weakest ones into clear next steps, and delete the duplicates. Working through one assessment type at a time keeps the job manageable and produces a bank that genuinely matches what you mark. The steps below turn an ordinary marking pile into a reusable resource you keep for years.
- Keep a running document open while marking and capture repeated comments
- Tackle one assessment type or subject at a time
- Sort the captured comments under each criterion
- Rewrite vague comments into a clear, actionable next step
- Borrow and adapt strong comments from faculty colleagues
How do you keep feedback personal when you are reusing comments?
Keep feedback personal by pairing reusable comments with one or two lines written just for that student. A bank handles the recurring majority — the common strengths and the common errors — which frees time to add a specific observation that shows you read the work closely. That combination is faster than marking freehand and often reads as more personal, because you are no longer worn down by the repetitive parts.
The gaps-and-placeholders habit protects the personal feel too: a comment that references the student’s actual example or wording never lands as a form letter. Reserve fully individual comments for the things that matter most — a striking idea, a stubborn misconception, or real progress since the last piece of work.
How do you maintain a comment bank so it doesn't go stale?
Maintain a comment bank by treating it as a living document you prune and update, not a fixed list. After each round of marking, add any strong new comments and retire the ones you no longer use or that no longer fit the current criteria. Keeping it aligned with your rubric, and with the relevant achievement standards, keeps the advice accurate as courses and expectations shift.
Watch for the two failure modes. A bank that grows without pruning becomes as slow to search as freehand marking, and a bank leaned on too heavily starts to sound generic. A quick review each term — trimming dead entries, sharpening wording, checking alignment — keeps it both fast to use and genuinely useful to students.
How can a marking tool apply your comment bank consistently?
A marking tool helps by applying your comment bank and rubric consistently across a whole class while leaving every judgement with you. Rather than hunting through a document for the right code, you can have a first draft of feedback assembled from your own criteria and comments, then edit it. The repetitive matching is handled for you; the professional decisions stay yours.
That is the balance worth aiming for: reuse for the routine, teacher control over what matters. Get started with JeddAI to draft feedback and marking from your own rubric, success criteria and comment banks, then review and adjust each comment before it reaches a student. Used this way, your comment bank speeds up marking without ever tipping into generic feedback.
Frequently asked questions
How many comments should a comment bank have?
There is no fixed number. Start small with the most common comment for each criterion and grow from there. A focused bank of well-written comments beats a huge list you cannot search quickly.
How is a comment bank different from a rubric?
A rubric describes levels of quality against criteria; a comment bank supplies the actual feedback wording you give against those criteria. They work together — the rubric guides the judgement, the bank speeds up communicating it.
Should students see the comment codes like A1 or B2?
Codes are mainly for your speed while marking, so expand them into full comments for students. If you want students to self-assess, you can teach the codes explicitly so they map to the same criteria.
Can one comment bank work for essays and short answers alike?
It is usually better to keep a separate bank per assessment type, because the criteria differ. Comments tied to specific success criteria transfer poorly across very different tasks.
Where should I store a comment bank?
Wherever you can search and reuse it fastest — a document, a spreadsheet, your LMS comment feature, or a marking tool that inserts comments against your criteria as you go.
Get started with Jeddle
Jeddle gives teachers and students instant, syllabus-aligned feedback powered by JeddAI.
Looking for study material? Browse Jeddle's Australian-English subject resources, or explore more articles on Feedback & Assessment.
