NAPLAN writing is marked with an analytic rubric of ten criteria, each scored separately by trained markers rather than given a single overall grade. The genre is either persuasive or narrative, and the ten criteria cover audience, structure, ideas, language and conventions like spelling and punctuation.
What rubric is used to mark NAPLAN writing?
NAPLAN writing is marked with a national analytic marking guide built around ten separate criteria. Every student response is scored against the same rubric, whether the task is persuasive or narrative, so the result reflects shared expectations rather than one marker’s overall impression. The guide describes what quality looks like at each score point for every criterion, which is what keeps marking anchored to evidence in the writing.
The genre is decided nationally each year and is common across the year levels sat, which are Years 3, 5, 7 and 9. Students respond to one stimulus prompt, and markers apply the matching version of the guide. Because the criteria and descriptors are fixed in advance, two students who write equally well should receive comparable scores no matter who marks their work.
What are the ten NAPLAN writing marking criteria?
The ten criteria break writing into distinct, observable features so each can be judged on its own. They move from whole-text qualities, such as how well a piece suits its audience and holds together, down to sentence-level control of grammar, punctuation and spelling. Each criterion carries its own score range, so some features contribute more marks to the total than others do.
One criterion changes with the genre: persuasive tasks assess persuasive devices, while narrative tasks assess character and setting. The remaining criteria stay the same across both genres. Setting them out shows how the rubric deliberately samples the full range of a writer’s skill, from ideas and organisation through to the conventions that make a piece clear and readable for its audience.
- Audience: how well the writing meets the reader's needs and expectations
- Text structure: the organisation of the piece as a whole
- Ideas: the relevance, depth and development of content
- Persuasive devices or character and setting: depending on the genre set
- Vocabulary: the range and precision of word choice
- Cohesion: how clearly ideas connect across the text
- Paragraphing: the grouping of related ideas
- Sentence structure: controlled, varied and grammatical sentences
- Punctuation: accurate use that guides the reader
- Spelling: accuracy across common and more difficult words
What is the difference between analytic and holistic marking?
Analytic marking scores each criterion separately and adds the results, while holistic marking gives a single overall impression score for the whole piece. NAPLAN uses the analytic approach, which is why one response produces a profile of ten scores instead of a single grade. Scoring feature by feature makes the marking more transparent and easier to check and moderate.
The analytic method has a practical payoff for teachers. It shows where a student is strong and where they need work: a writer might score well on ideas and vocabulary yet lose marks on paragraphing and punctuation. A holistic grade would hide that pattern, whereas a criterion-by-criterion breakdown points straight to what to teach next.
For a teacher, that transparency is the real value. Because each criterion is defined and scored on its own, feedback can point to a named skill, such as cohesion or sentence structure, rather than a vague sense that a piece is good or weak. Students can then see exactly which feature to improve to lift their next result.
How do markers keep their scoring consistent?
Markers keep their scoring consistent through training, shared exemplars and ongoing checks against pre-scored scripts. Before and during marking, they study annotated sample responses that anchor each score point, so everyone interprets the descriptors the same way. Their accuracy is monitored so that drift, gradually becoming harsher or more lenient, is noticed and corrected early.
This is a form of moderation. Rather than relying on a single reader, the process uses control scripts with agreed scores, repeat marking of some responses and supervision to keep judgements aligned. The goal is reliability: the same piece of writing should earn the same marks whichever trained marker reads it, and whenever it is read.
How does the genre change what is marked?
The genre changes one criterion and the emphasis behind several others, without altering the overall shape of the rubric. In a persuasive task, markers look for persuasive devices and a clearly held position; in a narrative task, they look for character, setting and a developed storyline. Audience, text structure, ideas, vocabulary and the language conventions are assessed either way.
Because the genre is announced with the prompt, students and teachers know which skills are in focus on the day. Practising both genres against the published criteria helps students see that a strong response is not merely error-free; it is shaped for its purpose, whether that purpose is to convince a reader or to tell an engaging story.
How are criterion scores turned into a NAPLAN result?
The ten criterion scores are added into a raw total, which is then placed on the national NAPLAN scale and reported against proficiency levels. Since 2023, results have been described with four proficiency levels rather than the older numeric bands, so a writing result shows how a student is tracking against a clear standard for their year.
The four levels give context that a raw mark alone cannot. They indicate whether a student is exceeding, meeting or working towards the expected proficiency, and they let schools compare results fairly across year levels that sat different prompts. For classroom planning, though, the underlying criterion scores usually remain the most useful part, because they name specific skills to work on.
It is worth remembering that the criterion scores and the reported level answer different questions. The level summarises where a student sits against a national standard, while the criterion profile explains why they sit there. Reading the two together gives the fullest picture of a young writer’s strengths and next steps.
- Exceeding: performance above the expected level for the year
- Strong: meeting a challenging but reasonable expectation
- Developing: approaching the expected level
- Needs additional support: likely to benefit from extra help
How can teachers apply the same criteria in their own marking?
Teachers can apply the same principle by marking writing analytically against explicit criteria instead of a single overall impression. Turning the NAPLAN criteria, or your own school rubric, into a shared checklist gives students specific, repeatable feedback and makes each mark easier to justify. It also mirrors the way high-stakes writing is actually assessed.
Consistency across a whole class set is the hard part, and it is where good tools can help. Get started with JeddAI to draft criterion-aligned feedback and marks from your own rubric and comment banks; you review and adjust every judgement, staying in control while saving time. Applied well, that pairing helps every student get the same careful reading.
Frequently asked questions
Is NAPLAN writing marked by computers or by people?
NAPLAN writing is marked by trained human markers, not by automated scoring. Their judgements are checked against control scripts and supervised so that marking stays reliable across the many people involved.
Do Year 3 and Year 9 students use the same marking criteria?
Yes. The same criteria and marking guide apply across the tested year levels. The difference is the standard expected at each year and where a raw score sits on the national scale.
How many marks is the NAPLAN writing task worth?
Each criterion has its own score range, so some criteria carry more weight than others. The scores are added into a raw total that is then converted to a scaled score, rather than reported as a simple percentage.
Can students see the rubric before the test?
The marking criteria and annotated sample responses are published, so teachers and students can practise against the same descriptors markers use. Only the specific prompt is kept secret until test day.
Does NAPLAN test both narrative and persuasive writing?
Both genres sit within the NAPLAN writing construct, but a single test uses one genre, announced with the prompt. Which genre appears can vary from year to year, so it is worth practising both.
Get started with Jeddle
Jeddle gives teachers and students instant, syllabus-aligned feedback powered by JeddAI.
Looking for study material? Browse Jeddle's Australian-English subject resources, or explore more articles on Feedback & Assessment.
